Image fusion for autonomous vehicle operation

ABSTRACT

Devices, systems and methods for fusing scenes from real-time image feeds from on-vehicle cameras in autonomous vehicles to reduce redundancy of the information processed to enable real-time autonomous operation are described. One example of a method for improving perception in an autonomous vehicle includes receiving a plurality of cropped images, wherein each of the plurality of cropped images comprises one or more bounding boxes that correspond to one or more objects in a corresponding cropped image; identifying, based on the metadata in the plurality of cropped images, a first bounding box in a first cropped image and a second bounding box in a second cropped image, wherein the first and second bounding boxes correspond to a common object; and fusing the metadata corresponding to the common object from the first cropped image and the second cropped image to generate an output result for the common object.

CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This patent application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 16/442,182, filed on Jun. 14, 2019. The aforementioned application of which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.

TECHNICAL FIELD

This document generally relates to image processing to improve autonomous vehicular driving.

BACKGROUND

Autonomous vehicle navigation is a technology for sensing the position and movement of a vehicle and, based on the sensing, autonomously control the vehicle to navigate towards a destination. Autonomous vehicle navigation can have important applications in transportation of people, goods and services. One of the components of autonomous driving, which ensures the safety of the vehicle and its passengers, as well as people and property in the vicinity of the vehicle, is the use of multiple cameras and the real-time responsiveness of the driving algorithms for safety and maneuvering.

SUMMARY

Disclosed are devices, systems and methods for fusing scenes from real-time image feeds from on-vehicle cameras in autonomous vehicles to reduce redundancy of the information processed to enable real-time autonomous operation. In one aspect, the disclosed technology can be used to provide a method for improving perception in an autonomous vehicle. This method includes receiving a plurality of cropped images, wherein each of the plurality of cropped images comprises one or more bounding boxes that correspond to one or more objects in a corresponding cropped image; identifying, based on the metadata in the plurality of cropped images, a first bounding box in a first cropped image and a second bounding box in a second cropped image, wherein the first and second bounding boxes correspond to a common object; and fusing the metadata corresponding to the common object from the first cropped image and the second cropped image to generate an output result for the common object.

In another aspect, the above-described method is embodied in the form of processor-executable code and stored in a computer-readable program medium.

In yet another aspect, a device that is configured or operable to perform the above-described method is disclosed. The device may include a processor that is programmed to implement this method.

The above and other aspects and features of the disclosed technology are described in greater detail in the drawings, the description and the claims.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 shows a block diagram of an exemplary long-distance perception system to perform image processing on images obtained from multiple cameras of an autonomous vehicle.

FIGS. 2A and 2B show an example of the pre-processing that generates inputs for the fusion of different scenes of real-time image feeds.

FIG. 3 shows an example of the workflow for the fusion of different scenes of real-time image feeds.

FIGS. 4A and 4B show an example of fusing two cropped images based on the detected characteristics of an object.

FIG. 5 shows another example of fusing two cropped images based on the detected characteristics of an object.

FIG. 6 shows a flowchart of an example method for improving perception in an autonomous vehicle, in accordance with embodiments of the disclosed technology.

FIG. 7 shows an example of a hardware platform that can implement some techniques described in the present document.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

The transportation industry has been undergoing considerable changes in the way technology is used to control the operation of the vehicles. As exemplified in the automotive passenger vehicle, there has been a general advancement towards shifting more of the operational and navigational decision making away from the human driving and into on-board computing power. This is exemplified in the extreme by the numerous under-development autonomous vehicles. Current implementations are in intermediate stages, such as the partially-autonomous operation in some vehicles (e.g., autonomous acceleration and navigation, but with the requirement of a present and attentive driver), the safety-protecting operation of some vehicles (e.g., maintaining a safe following distance and automatic braking), the safety-protecting warnings of some vehicles (e.g., blind-spot indicators in side-view mirrors and proximity sensors), as well as ease-of-use operations (e.g., autonomous parallel parking).

These different types of autonomous vehicles have been classified into different levels of automation by under the SAE International's J3016 standard, ranging from Level 0 in which the vehicle has no automation to Level 4 (L4), which is characterized by the vehicle operating without human input or oversight but only under select conditions defined by factors such as road type or geographic area, and Level 5 (L5), which is characterized as a driverless car that can operate on any road and in any environment a human driver could negotiate.

The differing levels of autonomy are typically supported by sensors or cameras that provides data or images of one or more areas surrounding the autonomous vehicle. A computer located in the conventional autonomous vehicle performs image processing to determine the presence or absence of objects (e.g., vehicles or pedestrians) within a limited range from the location of the autonomous vehicle. For example, using conventional techniques, a computer in an autonomous vehicle can perceive objects within a 300-meter distance from the location of the autonomous vehicle. However, a limited range of perception may not be sufficient if the autonomous vehicle is a semi-trailer truck. An autonomous semi-trailer truck is designed to drive safely on the road. However, in some cases, a limited range of perception (e.g., up to 300 meters) may not be sufficient to proactively detect an object on the road so that the autonomous semi-trailer truck may safely stop prior to colliding with or to safely maneuver around that object.

Section headings are used in the present document to improve readability of the description and do not in any way limit the discussion or the embodiments (and/or implementations) to the respective sections only.

Examples of a Long-Distance Perception System

FIG. 1 shows a block diagram of an exemplary long-distance perception system 100 to perform image processing on images obtained from one or more cameras 102 in or on an autonomous vehicle 101, such as an autonomous semi-trailer truck. The exemplary image processing techniques described in this patent document can be used to get an accurate three-dimension (3D) position of object located up to 1000 meters from the location of the autonomous vehicle 101. The exemplary image processing techniques can also be used to track and build motion models for each object perceived. Thus, the exemplary long-distance perception system 100 can be used to enhance safety of an autonomous vehicle 101 driven on the road.

Cameras, onboard computers and databases. In some embodiments, the long-distance perception system 100 includes one or more cameras 102 installed on or in an autonomous vehicle 101. Each camera 102 can generate high-resolution images in real-time while the autonomous vehicle 101 is in operation, such as driving on the road or stopping at a stop sign. In this patent document, the term image can include an image frame from a video feed of a camera 102. The resolution of an image frame from the one or more cameras 102 can be, for example, 1024×576 pixels. The one or more cameras 102 can obtain images at a speed of, for example, 20 frames per second (FPS).

FIG. 1 shows several modules and a database that can perform image processing based on the images received from the one or more cameras 102. The features or operations of the modules 104, 108, 110, 112 and terrain map database 106 are performed by an onboard computer 114 located in an autonomous vehicle 101. The onboard computer 114 located in the autonomous vehicle 101 includes at least one processor and a memory having instructions stored thereupon. The instructions upon execution by the processor configure the onboard computer 114 to perform the operations associated with the modules and/or database as described in this patent document.

In some embodiments, the terrain map database 106 may be stored in the onboard computer 114 and provides coordinates of various points in the spatial region (e.g., road surface or mountain elevation) where or around which the autonomous vehicle 101 is being driven or is located. The terrain map database 106 stores the terrain information that can be represented in 3D space or 3D world coordinates, where the coordinate information characterizes various points in the spatial region that surrounds the autonomous vehicle 101. For example, a terrain map database 106 can include 3D world coordinates for one or more points of a road surface on which the autonomous vehicle 101 is being driven. In another example, a terrain map database 106 can include 3D world coordinates for one or more points in a spatial region towards which or within which the autonomous vehicle 101 is being driven.

Image processing by the picture-in-picture module. In some embodiments, and as shown in FIG. 1 , the onboard computer 114 on an autonomous vehicle can perform image processing to perceive objects (e.g., vehicles, pedestrians, obstacles) from information provided by sensors such as cameras. The picture-in-picture (PIP) module 104 can process the images obtained from the camera(s) 102 to improve perception of objects that can be located far from the location of the autonomous vehicle 101.

As shown in FIG. 1 , the images obtained from each camera 102 is sent to a PIP module 104. As explained in this section, the PIP module 104 obtains an original image from a camera to select and crop one or more regions of interest in the image. Next, the PIP module 104 sends the cropped region(s) of interest in the image to one or more downstream modules as shown in FIG. 1 , such as the detection module 110.

In an example, the PIP module 104 can select and crop one or more regions of interest in an image obtained from a camera 102. The region(s) selected by the PIP module 104 may include area(s) located in front of the autonomous vehicle (e.g., road, highway ramp, or intersection). The selected area(s) are either past a pre-determined distance in front of the location of the autonomous vehicle (e.g., past a distance of 500 meters in front) or are within a range of pre-determined distances in front of the location of the autonomous vehicle (e.g., between 500 meters to 1000 meters in front).

In another example, the PIP module 104 may select and crop region(s) of interest in one of several ways. Typically, the PIP module 104 can obtain information about a road in front of the autonomous vehicle to select its region(s) of interest. For example, if the PIP module 104 determines that the road is straight (e.g., by identifying the curvature or shape of the lane markers), then the PIP module 104 can select and crop a center region of the original image that includes a region of the road or highway ramp or intersection, where the center region has a pre-determined pixel resolution. In another example, the PIP module 104 can obtain coordinate information of points on the road from a terrain map database 106 so that whether the road is curved or straight the PIP module 104 can select and crop one or more regions of interest that include region(s) of the road or highway ramp or intersection. In both these examples, the selected and cropped region(s) are located (i) in front of and either past, or (ii) within a range of pre-determined distances in front of the location of the autonomous vehicle.

Canvas algorithm for perception. In some embodiments, the long-distance perception system includes a canvas algorithm that fuses the vehicle detection outputs (from, for example, detection module 110 in FIG. 1 ) from different cameras or different crops of a single image, forming vehicle detection results on a unified virtual focal plane, which simplifies the processing of downstream modules. In an example, the vehicle detection algorithm outputs a bounding box, feature points, contour, lighting signals, vehicle classification and/or distance estimation of each visible vehicles in the photo.

Sensors for autonomous driving usually include cameras of different focal length pointing to the same direction (e.g., camera(s) 102 in FIG. 1 ). In an example, the vehicle detection algorithm will run on each camera photo separately. Each camera photo may have different regions of interest, so the vehicle detection algorithm may run on different crops of the original images separately. Therefore, there could be many separate vehicle detection results, processing whose interrelation could be burdensome for downstream systems.

However, since some of the cameras are pointing in the same general direction, are physically located close to each other, and have synchronized shutters, the captured images will satisfy some simple geometric transformations (e.g., projective transformations). The crops of an original image also satisfy the same family or geometric transformation. Therefore, using those geometric transformations, the vehicle detection outputs of different crops of different camera may be fused and unified vehicle detection results on a selected virtual focal plane be composed.

In an example, when fusing vehicle detection outputs, the field of view of each camera and each crop of photo must be considered, because one vehicle could be partially visible in some photo or crop of photo. In principle, visibility of each vehicle attribute in each output is inferred first, and then the unified vehicle attributes are predicted based on visibility, with conflictions properly flagged. Additional examples, which further elucidate embodiments of the disclosed technology are discussed in the next section.

Examples of Fusing Real-Time Image Feeds from On-Vehicle Cameras

As discussed above, crops of one or images can be fused to eliminate any redundancy in the images, which advantageously ensures efficient processing for real-time autonomous operation. FIGS. 2A and 2B show an example of the pre-processing that generates inputs for the fusion of different scenes of real-time image feeds. As shown in FIG. 2A, and as described above, a vehicle 200 may include at least a first camera 202-1 and a second camera 202-2. In an example, the first camera 202-1 may capture one or images from which a first cropped image 221 and a second cropped image 223 may be generated. Similarly, the second camera may capture an image from which a cropped image 227 is generated.

In an example, the first and second cameras may be pointing in substantially the same direction, which may result in the cropped images (221, 223 and 227) including a common object, whose information can then be fused. For example, and as shown in FIG. 2B, the second cropped image 223 may be an inset picture (and thus a subset) of the first cropped image 221, and will include a common object. The output of the fusion of these cropped images will retain the information in the images, but will typically be of a smaller byte size than the sum of the byte sizes of the two cropped images.

FIG. 3 shows an example of the workflow for the fusion of different scenes of real-time image feeds. As shown therein, and described in the context of FIG. 2A, multiple cameras (e.g., 302-1, 302-2 and 302-3) may be configured to capture images (not shown in FIG. 3 ), which are then cropped to generate a plurality of cropped images (e.g., 321, 323, 327, 329). For example, forward-facing camera #1 (302-1) captures images that result in cropped images 321 and 323, and forward-facing camera #2 (302-2) corresponds to another cropped image 327. In a similar manner, a rear-facing camera #3 (302-3) captures images that are cropped to generate an cropped image 329.

In some embodiments, the cropped images (e.g., 321, 323, 327 and 329) are processed by a detection module (e.g., detection module 110 in FIG. 1 ), which results in outputs (e.g., 331, 333, 337 and 339, respectively) that include the bounding boxes being used to identify objects in each of the cropped images. In an example, the objects that are detected may include vehicles (e.g., cars, trucks, motorcycles, etc.), pedestrians, and structures adjacent to roadways (e.g., signposts, fire hydrants, etc.).

In some embodiments, the bounding boxes in a cropped image may be associated with metadata that provides additional information corresponding to the objects detected in the cropped image. In an example, the metadata may include at least one of 2D or 3D detection results, a vehicle-type classification, a vehicle re-identification (e.g., a feature vector that includes the make, model and/or color of the vehicle), a taillight signal detection results and a vehicle segmentation mask (e.g., detailed contours of the vehicle).

In some embodiments, The metadata of the bounding boxes may be used to fuse the detection results for objects that are common amongst the cropped images. Embodiments of the disclosed technology provide methods for intra-camera fusion (e.g., fuse results from cropped images generated from images captured by a single camera) and inter-camera fusion (e.g., fuse results from cropped images generated from images captured from two or more cameras that are pointing in substantially the same direction).

Intra-camera fusion fuses results from cropped images generated from images captured by a single camera, and includes the steps of:

-   -   (i) Establishing a photometric correspondence between cropped         images using cropping information (e.g., focal length of camera,         which portion of image was cropped, etc.);     -   (ii) Match detection results for a common/identical vehicle         across images; and     -   (iii) Fuse detection results of different types to generate an         output 351.

Inter-camera fusion fuses results from cropped images generated from images captured from two or more cameras facing the same direction (e.g., forward-facing cameras #1 and #2 in FIG. 3 ), and includes the steps of:

(i) Establishing a photometric correspondence between cropped images using camera pose (e.g., based on calibrated camera position, focal length, etc.);

(ii) Match detection results for a common/identical vehicle across images; and

(iii) Fuse detection results of different types to generate an output 353.

In some embodiments, both intra-camera and inter-camera fusion compensate for the different fields-of-view in each of the cropped images, as well as the lack of consistent visibility in any set of cropped images. For example, only a portion of an object may be visible in one cropped image, and a different portion may be visible in another cropped image. Embodiments of the disclosed technology are advantageously able to integrate this information, thereby reducing any redundancy and ensuring real-time autonomous operation of the vehicle.

In some embodiments, different types of detection results, which are available in the metadata of the bounding boxes, may be fused. In an example, the different types of detection results include:

-   -   Multiple 2D bounding boxes, wherein the fused result includes         the largest bounding box that covers the object of interest that         is present in each of the bounding boxes     -   Multiple 3D bounding boxes, wherein the fused result includes an         average of visible keypoints (e.g., a identifiable location in         an image)     -   Vehicle type classification, wherein the fused result includes         the most common (e.g., a majority vote) vehicle type         classification amongst the input cropped images     -   Vehicle re-identification features, wherein the fused result         includes the largest visible feature amongst the input cropped         images     -   Taillight signal detection, wherein the fused result includes a         majority vote across the input cropped images, accounting for         visibility of the taillights     -   Vehicle segmentation mask, wherein the fused result includes the         largest coverage (e.g. a convex hull) of all the input         segmentation masks

FIGS. 4A and 4B show an example of fusing two cropped images based on the detected characteristics of an object. As shown in FIG. 4A, a first cropped image 421 may include the front portion of a vehicle, whereas a second cropped image 423 may include the rear portion of the vehicle. Bounding boxes in the first and second cropped images are matched, as shown in FIG. 4B, based on, for example, (i) the re-identification vector in the metadata of the bounding boxes, which may include the make, model and color of the detected vehicle, and (ii) the segmentation mask, whose contours can be aligned. Having identified the common vehicle in the two cropped images, the results may be fused to generate the result shown in FIG. 4B.

FIG. 5 shows another example of fusing two cropped images based on the detected characteristics of an object. A first cropped image 521 include the rear of a vehicle in which both the taillights of the vehicle are visible, whereas the second cropped image 523 includes a portion of the rear of the vehicle, in which only one of the taillights of the vehicle is visible. In an example, the taillight signal detection results may be as follows:

-   -   First cropped image 521 taillight detection         -   Left: red lighted         -   Right: red lighted     -   Second cropped image 523 taillight detection         -   Left: unknown         -   Right: red lighted

Give these exemplary detection results, the majority vote that is performed as part of the fusion process results in a {Left: red lighted, Right: red lighted} output result for the taillight signal detection. This example illustrates the efficacy of the disclosed technology in that the information available in both the input cropped images is preserved in the output result, but the amount of data in the output result is less than that of the input. Embodiments of the disclosed technology are able to reduce the redundant information in multiple cropped images, thereby reducing the amount of information that needs to be processed by downstream modules, and advantageously improving autonomous vehicle operation.

Exemplary Embodiments of the Disclosed Technology

FIG. 6 shows a flowchart for an example method 600 for improving perception in an autonomous vehicle. The method 600 includes, at step 610, receiving a plurality of cropped images, wherein each of the plurality of cropped images comprises one or more bounding boxes that correspond to one or more objects in a corresponding cropped image. In some embodiments, each of the one or more bounding boxes comprise metadata associated with a detection of the one or more objects.

The method 600 includes, at step 620, identifying, based on the metadata in the plurality of cropped images, a first bounding box in a first cropped image and a second bounding box in a second cropped image, the first and second bounding boxes corresponding to a common object.

The method 600 includes, at step 630, fusing the metadata corresponding to the common object from the first cropped image and the second cropped image to generate an output result for the common object.

In some embodiments, the common object is a vehicle, and the metadata of a bounding box comprises at least one of a vehicle feature vector, a taillight signal detection result or a vehicle segmentation mask corresponding to the vehicle detected in the first or the second bounding box. In an example, the metadata further comprises at least one of a camera pose, a focal length, a shutter speed or a field-of-view associated with a camera of the plurality of cameras that was a source for the cropped image. In another example, the vehicle feature vector comprises a color of the vehicle or a make of the vehicle. In yet another example, the vehicle segmentation mask comprises one or more contours of the vehicle.

In some embodiments, the plurality of cropped images is generated from one or more images captured by exactly one of the plurality of cameras.

In some embodiments, the plurality of cropped images is generated from one or more images captured by two of more of the plurality of cameras facing towards a substantially similar direction.

In some embodiments, the common object is a common vehicle, the first cropped image comprises a left taillight and a right taillight of the common vehicle, the second cropped image comprises exactly one taillight of the common vehicle, and the output result comprises a taillight signal detection that is a majority vote based on the left taillight, the right taillight and the exactly one taillight.

In some embodiments, the common object is a common vehicle, the first cropped image comprises a first vehicle segmentation mask corresponding to the common vehicle, the second cropped image comprises a second vehicle segmentation mask corresponding to the common vehicle, and the output result comprises a vehicle segmentation mask based on a convex combination of the first and second vehicle segmentation masks.

In some embodiments, a byte size of the output result is less than a byte size of the metadata corresponding to the common object from both the first and second cropped images.

FIG. 7 shows an example of a hardware platform 700 that can be used to implement some of the techniques described in the present document. For example, the hardware platform 700 may implement the method 600 or may implement the various modules described herein. The hardware platform 700 may include a processor 702 that can execute code to implement a method. The hardware platform 700 may include a memory 704 that may be used to store processor-executable code and/or store data. The hardware platform 700 may further include a communication interface 706. For example, the communication interface 706 may implement one or more of the communication protocols (LTE, Wi-Fi, and so on) described herein. The hardware platform may further include one or more cameras 740, a matching module 785 and a fusion module 795. In some embodiments, some portion or all of the matching module 785 and/or the fusion module 795 may be implemented in the processor 702.

Implementations of the subject matter and the functional operations described in this patent document can be implemented in various systems, digital electronic circuitry, or in computer software, firmware, or hardware, including the structures disclosed in this specification and their structural equivalents, or in combinations of one or more of them. Implementations of the subject matter described in this specification can be implemented as one or more computer program products, e.g., one or more modules of computer program instructions encoded on a tangible and non-transitory computer readable medium for execution by, or to control the operation of, data processing apparatus. The computer readable medium can be a machine-readable storage device, a machine-readable storage substrate, a memory device, a composition of matter effecting a machine-readable propagated signal, or a combination of one or more of them. The term “data processing unit” or “data processing apparatus” encompasses all apparatus, devices, and machines for processing data, including by way of example a programmable processor, a computer, or multiple processors or computers. The apparatus can include, in addition to hardware, code that creates an execution environment for the computer program in question, e.g., code that constitutes processor firmware, a protocol stack, a database management system, an operating system, or a combination of one or more of them.

A computer program (also known as a program, software, software application, script, or code) can be written in any form of programming language, including compiled or interpreted languages, and it can be deployed in any form, including as a stand-alone program or as a module, component, subroutine, or other unit suitable for use in a computing environment. A computer program does not necessarily correspond to a file in a file system. A program can be stored in a portion of a file that holds other programs or data (e.g., one or more scripts stored in a markup language document), in a single file dedicated to the program in question, or in multiple coordinated files (e.g., files that store one or more modules, sub programs, or portions of code). A computer program can be deployed to be executed on one computer or on multiple computers that are located at one site or distributed across multiple sites and interconnected by a communication network.

The processes and logic flows described in this specification can be performed by one or more programmable processors executing one or more computer programs to perform functions by operating on input data and generating output. The processes and logic flows can also be performed by, and apparatus can also be implemented as, special purpose logic circuitry, e.g., an FPGA (field programmable gate array) or an ASIC (application specific integrated circuit).

Processors suitable for the execution of a computer program include, by way of example, both general and special purpose microprocessors, and any one or more processors of any kind of digital computer. Generally, a processor will receive instructions and data from a read only memory or a random access memory or both. The essential elements of a computer are a processor for performing instructions and one or more memory devices for storing instructions and data. Generally, a computer will also include, or be operatively coupled to receive data from or transfer data to, or both, one or more mass storage devices for storing data, e.g., magnetic, magneto optical disks, or optical disks. However, a computer need not have such devices. Computer readable media suitable for storing computer program instructions and data include all forms of nonvolatile memory, media and memory devices, including by way of example semiconductor memory devices, e.g., EPROM, EEPROM, and flash memory devices. The processor and the memory can be supplemented by, or incorporated in, special purpose logic circuitry.

While this patent document contains many specifics, these should not be construed as limitations on the scope of any invention or of what may be claimed, but rather as descriptions of features that may be specific to particular embodiments of particular inventions. Certain features that are described in this patent document in the context of separate embodiments can also be implemented in combination in a single embodiment. Conversely, various features that are described in the context of a single embodiment can also be implemented in multiple embodiments separately or in any suitable subcombination. Moreover, although features may be described above as acting in certain combinations and even initially claimed as such, one or more features from a claimed combination can in some cases be excised from the combination, and the claimed combination may be directed to a subcombination or variation of a subcombination.

Similarly, while operations are depicted in the drawings in a particular order, this should not be understood as requiring that such operations be performed in the particular order shown or in sequential order, or that all illustrated operations be performed, to achieve desirable results. Moreover, the separation of various system components in the embodiments described in this patent document should not be understood as requiring such separation in all embodiments.

Only a few implementations and examples are described and other implementations, enhancements and variations can be made based on what is described and illustrated in this patent document. 

What is claimed is:
 1. A method implemented by a processor disposed in a vehicle, the method comprising: receiving images from one or more sensors installed in the vehicle; applying, on the images, a detection algorithm stored in the processor to identify a first bounding box in a first image and a second bounding box in a second image, wherein the first bounding box and the second bounding box are associated with metadata providing information corresponding to a common object; and generating an output including a fusion of the first image and the second image, the output having a size smaller than a sum of a size of the first image and a size of the second image.
 2. The method of claim 1, further comprising: fusing the first image and the second image based on the metadata.
 3. The method of claim 1, further comprising, before the applying of the detection algorithm: selecting and cropping one or more regions of interest in an image.
 4. The method of claim 1, wherein the first image and the second image are from a same sensor.
 5. The method of claim 1, wherein the first image and the second image are from different sensors facing a substantially similar direction.
 6. The method of claim 1, wherein the common object is a vehicle, and wherein the metadata of a bounding box comprises at least one of a vehicle feature vector, a taillight signal detection result or a vehicle segmentation mask corresponding to the vehicle detected in the first bounding box or the second bounding box.
 7. The method of claim 1, wherein the common object is a common vehicle, wherein the first image comprises a left taillight and a right taillight of the common vehicle, wherein the second image comprises exactly one taillight of the common vehicle, and wherein the output comprises a taillight signal detection that is a majority vote based on the left taillight, the right taillight and the exactly one taillight.
 8. The method of claim 1, wherein the common object is a common vehicle, wherein the first image comprises a first vehicle segmentation mask corresponding to the common vehicle, wherein the second image comprises a second vehicle segmentation mask corresponding to the common vehicle, and wherein the output comprises a vehicle segmentation mask based on a convex combination of the first vehicle segmentation mask and the second vehicle segmentation mask.
 9. The method of claim 1, wherein the applying the detection algorithm provides detection outputs having a unified focal plane.
 10. An apparatus implemented in a vehicle, comprising: a plurality of sensors; a processor; and a memory with instructions thereon, wherein images are generated from one or more images captured by at least one of the plurality of sensors, wherein the instructions upon execution by the processor cause the processor to: identify, based on metadata in the images, a first bounding box in a first image and a second bounding box in a second image, wherein the first bounding box and the second bounding box correspond to a common object; generate an output including a fusion of the first image and the second image, wherein a size of the output is smaller than a sum of a size of the first image and a size of the second image.
 11. The apparatus of claim 10, wherein the metadata includes at least one of 2D or 3D detection results, a vehicle-type classification, a vehicle identification, a taillight signal detection results, or a vehicle segmentation mask.
 12. The apparatus of claim 10, wherein the first image and the second image are from a same sensor.
 13. The apparatus of claim 10, wherein the first image and the second image are from different sensors facing a substantially similar direction.
 14. The apparatus of claim 10, wherein the common object is a vehicle, a pedestrian, a structure adjacent to roadways.
 15. A computer-readable storage medium having code stored thereon, the code, upon execution by one or more processors, causing the one or more processors to implement a method comprising: receiving, from one or more sensors, images; applying, on the images, a detection algorithm stored in the one or more processors to identify a first bounding box in a first image and a second bounding box in a second image, wherein the first bounding box and the second bounding box are associated with metadata providing information corresponding to a common object; and generating an output including a fusion of the first image and the second image, the output having a size smaller than a sum of a size of the first image and a size of the second image.
 16. The computer-readable storage medium of claim 15, wherein the metadata of the first bounding box comprises at least one of an object feature vector, a taillight signal detection result or an object segmentation mask corresponding to the common object detected in the first bounding box.
 17. The computer-readable storage medium of claim 16, wherein the metadata of the first bounding box in the first image further comprises at least one of a camera pose, a focal length, a shutter speed or a field-of-view associated with a sensor that has generated the first image.
 18. The computer-readable storage medium of claim 16, wherein the object feature vector comprises a color of an object or a make of the object.
 19. The computer-readable storage medium of claim 16, wherein the object segmentation mask comprises one or more contours of an object.
 20. The computer-readable storage medium of claim 15, wherein the images are generated by exactly one of the one or more sensors or two or more of the one or more sensors facing towards a substantially similar direction. 